Most of the technical specifications presented in this post are accurate. , oh, is that an LP, hmmm I’ll be dammmmned. More people made their own cassette tapes, another big acceptance factor. Some, not that many, made their own recordings.Ĭassette, 1/8" tape, only 4 tracks so essentially same track width as 8 track, but now only 1-7/8 IPS, Originally for dictation, offices, classrooms, not music.Ĭassettes benefited from very good transport mechanism, and noise reduction, and of course portability and the Sony Walkman revolution. The sound quality, beyond ’good enough’ not even considered. Inside: how do you put lots of tape on the larger outside circumference, and take small amount of tape off the smaller inner diameter? Tape constantly slip/sliding/compressing as it moves from the outside to the inside, then, to get out of the tightly compressed inside of the reel, the tape is pulled up, constantly wearing the edges of the tape.Ī small amount of tape for a single 1 minute AD, that’s one thing, but 40 minutes of tape, it’s incredible they didn’t stretch, or break, wait, I seem to remember, they did stretch and break, and the metal strip fell off, and the glue joint broke, and the pressure pads rotted, and the moving heads got misaligned, holy crappp indeed.Ĩ Track became extremely popular because they were a revolution of portability, take, share, play in car. I did have 15 IPS 2 track for a while as well as 15 IPS 4 forward tracks, but gave them to musician friends.Įver take one apart? 8 skinny tracks on the same 1/4" tape, running 3-3/4 IPS, using the cleverly hideous physical design of a slip sheet. I have some 2 tracks made from those masters, best sounding tapes I have. Magnificent masters were made on 35mm tape at 30 IPS (modified movie film). 1/4" wide 2 track (wider track width) beats my 4 track, and 15 IPS beats 7-1/2 IPS. 4 track, 3-3/4 IPS loses to LP and/or CD. My 1/4" wide tape 4 track tapes, at 7-1/2" IPS, can beat an LP which can beat the CD. Anything with narrower tracks than 1/4" tape 4 track and/or slower speed than 7-1/2 IPS cannot beat an LP. Wider tracks and/or faster speed simply uses more magnetic material to capture the content. End of AD campaign, toss it in the trash quickly. DJ just jammed that cartridge/ad in the player. For pre-packaged single advertising content. Not 8 track, not Cassette, not 3-3/4 IPS, not 1-7/8 IPS.ĨT was originally designed for only a small amount of tape inside (less weight, smaller ratio of inside/outside diameter, less slip/compression). Master Tape and tape copies played with excellent mechanical transport system, enough track width, fast enough speeds (IPS) can beat an LP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |